After serving 25 years in the Texas Prison System, Michael Morton has been released pending the final results of DNA tests expected to prove he did not kill his wife.  John Bradley, former head of the Texas Forensic Science Commission and a Rick Perry appointee, has recently been the DA in charge of Mr. Morton's case and in that position has tried for six years to block the DNA tests that could exonerate Morton.  Mr. Bradley now says he had "good faith" reasons to oppose the DNA tests.  Good faith???  Suppression of evidence that could prove one man innocent and potentially lead to the discovery and possible conviction of the person actually responsible is "good faith?"  Under Mr. Bradley's leadership, he consistently worked against the Commission's goal of "Justice through Science."  In John Bradley's world, good faith must mean winning at any cost, even the cost of a man's life. He proved that in the Cameron Todd Willingham case (Mr. Willingham was executed in 2004) by delaying for 19 months the findings that the science used to convict Mr. Willingham of killing his three young daughters was seriously flawed.  John Bradley's political patron, Governor Rick Perry, cooperated with Mr. Bradley by blocking the testimony of Craig Beyler, the expert hired by the Commission to investigate the Willingham case.  With so much emphasis on our economic situation in recent years, we cannot lose sight of other priorities.  Shouldn't fairness and transparency in our justice system warrant scrutiny?  Isn't a man's life and freedom worth our "good faith"  efforts?